<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can you be an affiliate and be pro-privacy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leavingthedayjob.com/2008/03/17/can-you-be-an-affiliate-and-be-pro-privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leavingthedayjob.com/2008/03/17/can-you-be-an-affiliate-and-be-pro-privacy/</link>
	<description>Leaving the day job through the wonders of affiliate marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:34:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monty</title>
		<link>http://www.leavingthedayjob.com/2008/03/17/can-you-be-an-affiliate-and-be-pro-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>Monty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leavingthedayjob.com/2008/03/17/can-you-be-an-affiliate-and-be-pro-privacy/#comment-713</guid>
		<description>Hi Jez

Thanks for your comments.

I agree about Gmail. I use it myself. I disagree though that data isn&#039;t personal unless it includes names or personal details. As I say in the post, the AOL data fiasco proved that individuals can still be identified even from apparently anonymous data.

Ultimately it&#039;s up to individuals how much data they are prepared to give up. A lot of people enjoy filling in those surveys you get in newspapers in return for the chance to win a hamper or something. I wouldn&#039;t do that. Either way, it&#039;s a choice you make. Phorm, it seems, is not a choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jez</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments.</p>
<p>I agree about Gmail. I use it myself. I disagree though that data isn&#8217;t personal unless it includes names or personal details. As I say in the post, the AOL data fiasco proved that individuals can still be identified even from apparently anonymous data.</p>
<p>Ultimately it&#8217;s up to individuals how much data they are prepared to give up. A lot of people enjoy filling in those surveys you get in newspapers in return for the chance to win a hamper or something. I wouldn&#8217;t do that. Either way, it&#8217;s a choice you make. Phorm, it seems, is not a choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jez</title>
		<link>http://www.leavingthedayjob.com/2008/03/17/can-you-be-an-affiliate-and-be-pro-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leavingthedayjob.com/2008/03/17/can-you-be-an-affiliate-and-be-pro-privacy/#comment-712</guid>
		<description>Are you tracking people (names / personal details) or machines (IP&#039;s / sessions).

IMO it is not a privacy issue unless you attempt to track people.

Unless my ISP sells my personal details to match my IP / Port I couldn&#039;t care less.

Its the same argument with Gmail... I use Gmail all the time and don&#039;t feel my privacy is being invaded by a bit of adsense... if someone at Gmail were reading my emails that would be different...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you tracking people (names / personal details) or machines (IP&#8217;s / sessions).</p>
<p>IMO it is not a privacy issue unless you attempt to track people.</p>
<p>Unless my ISP sells my personal details to match my IP / Port I couldn&#8217;t care less.</p>
<p>Its the same argument with Gmail&#8230; I use Gmail all the time and don&#8217;t feel my privacy is being invaded by a bit of adsense&#8230; if someone at Gmail were reading my emails that would be different&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

