<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can you be an affiliate and be pro-privacy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leavingthedayjob.com/2008/03/17/can-you-be-an-affiliate-and-be-pro-privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leavingthedayjob.com/2008/03/17/can-you-be-an-affiliate-and-be-pro-privacy/</link>
	<description>Leaving the day job through the wonders of affiliate marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Monty</title>
		<link>http://www.leavingthedayjob.com/2008/03/17/can-you-be-an-affiliate-and-be-pro-privacy/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>Monty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leavingthedayjob.com/2008/03/17/can-you-be-an-affiliate-and-be-pro-privacy/#comment-713</guid>
		<description>Hi Jez

Thanks for your comments.

I agree about Gmail. I use it myself. I disagree though that data isn't personal unless it includes names or personal details. As I say in the post, the AOL data fiasco proved that individuals can still be identified even from apparently anonymous data.

Ultimately it's up to individuals how much data they are prepared to give up. A lot of people enjoy filling in those surveys you get in newspapers in return for the chance to win a hamper or something. I wouldn't do that. Either way, it's a choice you make. Phorm, it seems, is not a choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jez</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments.</p>
<p>I agree about Gmail. I use it myself. I disagree though that data isn&#8217;t personal unless it includes names or personal details. As I say in the post, the AOL data fiasco proved that individuals can still be identified even from apparently anonymous data.</p>
<p>Ultimately it&#8217;s up to individuals how much data they are prepared to give up. A lot of people enjoy filling in those surveys you get in newspapers in return for the chance to win a hamper or something. I wouldn&#8217;t do that. Either way, it&#8217;s a choice you make. Phorm, it seems, is not a choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jez</title>
		<link>http://www.leavingthedayjob.com/2008/03/17/can-you-be-an-affiliate-and-be-pro-privacy/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leavingthedayjob.com/2008/03/17/can-you-be-an-affiliate-and-be-pro-privacy/#comment-712</guid>
		<description>Are you tracking people (names / personal details) or machines (IP's / sessions).

IMO it is not a privacy issue unless you attempt to track people.

Unless my ISP sells my personal details to match my IP / Port I couldn't care less.

Its the same argument with Gmail... I use Gmail all the time and don't feel my privacy is being invaded by a bit of adsense... if someone at Gmail were reading my emails that would be different...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you tracking people (names / personal details) or machines (IP&#8217;s / sessions).</p>
<p>IMO it is not a privacy issue unless you attempt to track people.</p>
<p>Unless my ISP sells my personal details to match my IP / Port I couldn&#8217;t care less.</p>
<p>Its the same argument with Gmail&#8230; I use Gmail all the time and don&#8217;t feel my privacy is being invaded by a bit of adsense&#8230; if someone at Gmail were reading my emails that would be different&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
